![]() ![]() ![]() Give it a try for yourself and start making the transition to multi-architecture Docker images today." "Create a multi-architecture build instanceĪs we have seen, building multi-architecture containers can be created with buildx in the same way as with Docker Desktop for Mac and Windows. If an older qemu is used some application may not work correctly on the x86 hardware." For best results, the latest qemu image should be used. "Install the qemu instruction emulation to register Arm executables to run on the x86 machine. While that code will not be optimized for the way the M1 works it should run reasonably. Does VMWare or Parallels even work on the M1 Macs yet?Ĭlick to expand.Uh, as I said in in this thread a long time ago, "Read Getting started with Docker for Arm on Linux especially the " Register Arm executables to run on 圆4 machines" and note the date: Jun 07 2019. ipa file on the new Macs? I mean, it seems like UTM is already made to run on the M1 Macs, no? Whether the OS VM works or not is another question, but I'm sure anyone should be able to at least try, right? UTM is a GUI for QEMU on iOS, so I'd just assume the. I'd assume installing UTM would be no different than "installing" any other. I've been able to use Fedora and a build of Linux Mint in UTM on my iPad Pro with not much lag. I'm still really curious how UTM would work. I'm not sure what VMWare has officially said about M1/ARM but Parallels blog post sounded promising. I'll still have my 2015 MBP for a bit and can use them there when I (rarely) need them until I sell it. I've got a Snow Leopard VM and an older specific Windows 7 build VM I use, but I'm optimistic I'll be able to use them again in time. Currently a bug in Big Sur about loading QEMU ::EDIT:: Looks like UTM will be working again at some point soon. I'm stuck waiting until next week+ for my MBP13M1 to try all this. Does VMWare or Parallels even work on the M1 Macs yet? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |